DIJA Review, Is DIJA Non-Toxic?
Across 1 graded product, DIJA averages Excellent (95/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. 1 of its products grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Worth buying from DIJA Good or better, best-graded first
DIJA
Alkaline Water Filter Pitcher
Plastic pitcher with activated carbon/ionization filter cartridge
BPA & bisphenols
The pitcher's plastic type is not publicly disclosed by the brand. If the housing uses…
Cartridge particulate shedding and bacterial growth
Activated carbon can shed fine black particles if the cartridge degrades or is installed…
Undisclosed cartridge material composition
The brand does not publish detailed safety data sheets or certifications for the…
Microbiological contamination from standing water
Pitcher filters reduce but do not eliminate all bacteria; standing water in the pitcher…
Lower PFAS risk than coated cookware, but pitcher material and filter contents remain unclear.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
DIJA and PFAS, common questions
- Does DIJA have PFAS?
- We graded 1 DIJA product, averaging Excellent (95/100). 1 grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
- Is DIJA non-toxic?
- DIJA Alkaline Water Filter Pitcher is the highest-graded DIJA product we have scored, at 95/100. It depends on the product line rather than the brand, so check the grade of the exact item you are buying.
- Which DIJA products are lower concern for PFAS?
- The highest-graded DIJA products we have scored are DIJA Alkaline Water Filter Pitcher. That is our model-based estimate from materials and public disclosure, not a lab test.
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →