25Poor

Katom Review, Is Katom Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 2 graded products, Katom averages Poor (25/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Total Home Parchment Paper

Katom

Total Home Parchment Paper

silicone-coated parchment paper

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
🍂

Silicone coating adhesion and microparticle release

Repeated heating cycles may cause silicone to separate from the parchment base…

70
⚠️

Thermal decomposition of silicone above 220°C

Food-grade silicone is stable to approximately 220°C under continuous use. Prolonged or…

70

Parchment paper typically uses silicone; lower concern than fluorinated coatings.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Member's Mark Unbleached Parchment Paper 410 sq. ft

Katom

Member's Mark Unbleached Parchment Paper 410 sq. ft

unbleached paper with grease-resistant coating

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade3Bad
🫧

Coating degradation and particulate shedding

Unbleached parchment with undisclosed coating composition may shed microscopic particles…

70
🍳

Thermal decomposition of coating at high heat

If coating includes proprietary synthetics or low-grade polymers, exposure to…

70
🫧

Microplastic/microparticle ingestion from degraded paper

Unbleached paper fibers can migrate into fatty or acidic foods (oils, vinegars, acidic…

70
🍳

Unknown synthetic additives in coating

Katom/Sam's Club does not publish coating chemical inventory. Unbleached parchment from…

45

Parchment paper typically uses silicone or wax; coating chemistry unclear.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →