MacWet Review, Is MacWet Non-Toxic?
Across 1 graded product, MacWet averages Poor (40/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
MacWet
Micromesh Original Golf Rain Gloves
Micromesh nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish
water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish chemistry
Acushnet does not publicly disclose whether this product uses traditional PFAS-based…
Microfiber shedding from degraded coating
As the water-repellent coating finish wears (after repeated washing or heavy use), nylon…
Skip until brand discloses water-repellent coating treatment chemistry.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
MacWet and PFAS, common questions
- Does MacWet have PFAS?
- We graded 1 MacWet product, averaging Poor (40/100). None grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
- Is MacWet non-toxic?
- No MacWet product we graded reaches Good. The best of them is MacWet Micromesh Original Golf Rain Gloves at 40/100.
- Which MacWet products should I avoid?
- The lowest-graded MacWet products we have scored are MacWet Micromesh Original Golf Rain Gloves. Each one links to the evidence behind its grade.
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →