Aqua-Pure AP Easy LC Cooler vs Sustainable Pitcher: which is safer?

Soma Sustainable Pitcher is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

3M Aqua-Pure AP Easy LC Cooler

3M

Aqua-Pure AP Easy LC Cooler

PFAS grade

Excellent 95/100

Overall grade

Excellent 81/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Activated carbon and ion exchange filter media

Confidence

70%

PossibleBacterial growth in filter media (if unmaintained)

ReportedDegradation of filter media over time

Our pick

Soma Sustainable Pitcher

Soma

Sustainable Pitcher

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge

Confidence

72%

PossibleBacterial growth in filter housing

PossibleActivated carbon dust in water

PossibleRubber seal degradation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Bacterial growth in filter media (if unmaintained) and Degradation of filter media over time on the 3M and not on the Soma.
  • We flag Bacterial growth in filter housing, Activated carbon dust in water and Rubber seal degradation on the Soma and not on the 3M.
  • The 3M is Activated carbon and ion exchange filter media where the Soma is borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are 5 points apart, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More water filters: see the full ranking