Paper Straws vs Kraft Paper Straws: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Aardvark
Paper Straws
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
paper (uncoated or standard coating)
Confidence
72%
PossibleMold or microbial growth from moisture
PossiblePaper fragmentation ingestion
World Centric
Kraft Paper Straws
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Kraft paper (uncoated/minimally treated)
Confidence
78%
PossibleMicroorganism colonization and mold
PossibleFiber fragmentation under heat or prolonged contact
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Mold or microbial growth from moisture and Paper fragmentation ingestion on the Aardvark and not on the World Centric.
- We flag Microorganism colonization and mold and Fiber fragmentation under heat or prolonged contact on the World Centric and not on the Aardvark.
- The Aardvark is paper (uncoated or standard coating) where the World Centric is Kraft paper (uncoated/minimally treated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More paper straws: see the full ranking