Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth vs Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h: which is safer?
Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFormaldehyde in finishing resins
PossibleAzo dyes and colorfast concerns
PossibleHeavy metal contaminants in dyes
Ethan Allen
Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFormaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers in fabric finishes
PossibleFlame retardant chemicals (brominated or phosphate-based)
PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments in synthetic fibers
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Formaldehyde in finishing resins, Azo dyes and colorfast concerns, Heavy metal contaminants in dyes and Microbial growth and mold on the and not on the Ethan Allen.
- We flag Formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers in fabric finishes, Flame retardant chemicals (brominated or phosphate-based), Azo dyes and heavy metal pigments in synthetic fibers and Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing on the Ethan Allen and not on the .
- The is 100% cotton where the Ethan Allen is upholstery fabric (composition unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Ethan Allen grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More stain-resistant textiles: see the full ranking