Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth vs Nod Hill Collection Covers, 41.5"w x 41.5"d x 30"h, Square Dining Table Cover, Polyester by ETHAN ALLEN: which is safer?
Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFormaldehyde in finishing resins
PossibleAzo dyes and colorfast concerns
PossibleHeavy metal contaminants in dyes
Ethan Allen
Nod Hill Collection Covers, 41.5"w x 41.5"d x 30"h, Square Dining Table Cover, Polyester by ETHAN ALLEN
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyPFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) in water-repellent coating treatment
PossibleFormaldehyde in polyester finishing resins
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during washing
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Formaldehyde in finishing resins, Azo dyes and colorfast concerns, Heavy metal contaminants in dyes and Microbial growth and mold on the and not on the Ethan Allen.
- We flag Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in DWR treatment, Formaldehyde in polyester finishing resins, Microplastic shedding during washing and Coating degradation and material exposure over time on the Ethan Allen and not on the .
- The is 100% cotton where the Ethan Allen is Polyester with stain/water-resistant treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Ethan Allen grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More stain-resistant textiles: see the full ranking