Amethyst Water Filter Pitcher vs Sustainable Pitcher: which is safer?

Soma Sustainable Pitcher is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Aquaphor Amethyst Water Filter Pitcher

Aquaphor

Amethyst Water Filter Pitcher

PFAS grade

Excellent 95/100

Overall grade

Excellent 83/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Plastic pitcher with carbon/ion-exchange filter cartridge

Confidence

72%

PossibleBacterial growth in filter and standing water

PossibleFilter media degradation and particle shedding

PossibleInadequate contaminant removal for specific threats

Our pick

Soma Sustainable Pitcher

Soma

Sustainable Pitcher

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge

Confidence

72%

PossibleBacterial growth in filter housing

PossibleActivated carbon dust in water

PossibleRubber seal degradation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Bacterial growth in filter and standing water, Filter media degradation and particle shedding and Inadequate contaminant removal for specific threats on the Aquaphor and not on the Soma.
  • We flag Bacterial growth in filter housing, Activated carbon dust in water and Rubber seal degradation on the Soma and not on the Aquaphor.
  • The Aquaphor is Plastic pitcher with carbon/ion-exchange filter cartridge where the Soma is borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are 5 points apart, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More water filters: see the full ranking