Time MFP + Time Water Filter Jug - Compact and Convenient White vs Sustainable Pitcher: which is safer?

Soma Sustainable Pitcher is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Aquaphor Time MFP + Time Water Filter Jug - Compact and Convenient White

Aquaphor

Time MFP + Time Water Filter Jug - Compact and Convenient White

PFAS grade

Excellent 95/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

plastic housing, activated carbon and ion-exchange filter media

Confidence

72%

PossibleBacterial and mold growth in filter cartridge

LikelyContaminant breakthrough if cartridge not replaced

Our pick

Soma Sustainable Pitcher

Soma

Sustainable Pitcher

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge

Confidence

72%

PossibleBacterial growth in filter housing

PossibleActivated carbon dust in water

PossibleRubber seal degradation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Bacterial and mold growth in filter cartridge and Contaminant breakthrough if cartridge not replaced on the Aquaphor and not on the Soma.
  • We flag Bacterial growth in filter housing, Activated carbon dust in water and Rubber seal degradation on the Soma and not on the Aquaphor.
  • The Aquaphor is plastic housing, activated carbon and ion-exchange filter media where the Soma is borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are 5 points apart, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More water filters: see the full ranking