Ravi Time Filter Jug vs Sustainable Pitcher: which is safer?
Soma Sustainable Pitcher is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Aquaphor
Ravi Time Filter Jug
PFAS grade
Excellent 95/100
Overall grade
Excellent 87/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Plastic jug with activated carbon filter cartridge
Confidence
62%
PossibleBacterial growth in filter cartridge and jug
PossibleFilter cartridge housing durability and degradation
Our pick
Soma
Sustainable Pitcher
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 88/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge
Confidence
72%
PossibleBacterial growth in filter housing
PossibleActivated carbon dust in water
PossibleRubber seal degradation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Bacterial growth in filter cartridge and jug and Filter cartridge housing durability and degradation on the Aquaphor and not on the Soma.
- We flag Bacterial growth in filter housing, Activated carbon dust in water and Rubber seal degradation on the Soma and not on the Aquaphor.
- The Aquaphor is Plastic jug with activated carbon filter cartridge where the Soma is borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are 5 points apart, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More water filters: see the full ranking