Time Water Filter Pitcher - Convenient and Effective White vs Sustainable Pitcher: which is safer?

Soma Sustainable Pitcher is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Aquaphor Time Water Filter Pitcher - Convenient and Effective White

Aquaphor

Time Water Filter Pitcher - Convenient and Effective White

PFAS grade

Excellent 95/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Plastic pitcher with activated carbon filter cartridge

Confidence

72%

PossibleActivated carbon cartridge degradation and particle shedding

PossibleBacterial growth in filter housing and stagnant water

ReportedLack of third-party certification and transparency

Our pick

Soma Sustainable Pitcher

Soma

Sustainable Pitcher

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge

Confidence

72%

PossibleBacterial growth in filter housing

PossibleActivated carbon dust in water

PossibleRubber seal degradation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Activated carbon cartridge degradation and particle shedding, Bacterial growth in filter housing and stagnant water and Lack of third-party certification and transparency on the Aquaphor and not on the Soma.
  • We flag Bacterial growth in filter housing, Activated carbon dust in water and Rubber seal degradation on the Soma and not on the Aquaphor.
  • The Aquaphor is Plastic pitcher with activated carbon filter cartridge where the Soma is borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are 5 points apart, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More water filters: see the full ranking