Men's Slim Rapid Movement Chino Pants vs Men's Manhasset Stretch Straight-Fit Pants: which is safer?
Polo Ralph Lauren Men's Manhasset Stretch Straight-Fit Pants is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Banana Republic
Men's Slim Rapid Movement Chino Pants
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 4/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
Cotton-blend chino with water-repellent coating finish
Confidence
42%
Possiblewater-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish chemistry
PossibleFormaldehyde-based finishing resins
PossibleAntimony in polyester component
Our pick
Polo Ralph Lauren
Men's Manhasset Stretch Straight-Fit Pants
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
analysis pending
Verdict
pending
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
cotton stretch blend, no disclosed finishing
Confidence
72%
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Durable water-repellent (DWR) finish chemistry, Formaldehyde-based finishing resins, Antimony in polyester component and Skin sensitization from residual dyes or finishes on the Banana Republic and not on the Polo Ralph Lauren.
- The Banana Republic is Cotton-blend chino with durable water-repellent finish where the Polo Ralph Lauren is cotton stretch blend, no disclosed finishing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Polo Ralph Lauren is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Banana Republic grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More wrinkle-free professional workwear: see the full ranking