C03 Leather Protective Case with Shoulder Strap For Active 7/Active 10 Pro vs Juice Pack Apple iPhone 17 Pro: which is safer?
Blackview C03 Leather Protective Case with Shoulder Strap For Active 7/Active 10 Pro is the clear pick. mophie Juice Pack Apple iPhone 17 Pro carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Blackview
C03 Leather Protective Case with Shoulder Strap For Active 7/Active 10 Pro
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleHeavy metals in leather tanning (chromium, lead)
PossibleSynthetic dyes and colorants in leather and strap fabric
ReportedVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from tanning and finishing
Mophie
Juice Pack Apple iPhone 17 Pro
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePFAS in waterproof coating
PossibleCoating integrity and moisture ingress
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in leather tanning (chromium, lead), Synthetic dyes and colorants in leather and strap fabric, Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from tanning and finishing and Formaldehyde in leather finish resins on the Blackview and not on the Mophie.
- We flag PFAS in waterproof coating and Coating integrity and moisture ingress on the Mophie and not on the Blackview.
- The Blackview is leather (primary material), shoulder strap where the Mophie is Plastic housing with unspecified waterproof coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Blackview is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Mophie grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof phone cases: see the full ranking