Classic Umbrella vs Super Mini Manual ECO Compact Umbrella: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Blunt
Classic Umbrella
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 12/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Nylon canopy with proprietary water-resistant coating (unspecified)
Confidence
35%
PossiblePFAS in waterproof coating
PossibleCoating degradation and nanoparticle shedding
Totes
Super Mini Manual ECO Compact Umbrella
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 12/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
polyester/nylon fabric with unspecified water-repellent coating
Confidence
35%
PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating
PossibleCoating degradation and microplastics
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in waterproof coating and Coating degradation and nanoparticle shedding on the Blunt and not on the Totes.
- We flag PFAS in DWR coating and Coating degradation and microplastics on the Totes and not on the Blunt.
- The Blunt is Nylon canopy with proprietary water-resistant coating (unspecified) where the Totes is polyester/nylon fabric with unspecified water-repellent coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More umbrellas: see the full ranking