Men's Dress Shirt Slim Fit Non Iron vs Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt: which is safer?
Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Calvin Klein
Men's Dress Shirt Slim Fit Non Iron
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 2/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
cotton blend with durable press/non-iron finish
Confidence
35%
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in durable-press finish
ReportedCoating degradation and microfiber shedding
PossibleChlorine bleach sensitivity in treated fabric
Our pick
Carhartt
Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
100% cotton jersey knit, untreated
Confidence
78%
PossibleAzo dyes
PossibleMicrofiber shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Formaldehyde resins in durable-press finish, Coating degradation and microfiber shedding and Chlorine bleach sensitivity in treated fabric on the Calvin Klein and not on the Carhartt.
- We flag Azo dyes and Microfiber shedding on the Carhartt and not on the Calvin Klein.
- The Calvin Klein is cotton blend with durable press/non-iron finish where the Carhartt is 100% cotton jersey knit, untreated, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Carhartt is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Calvin Klein grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof sports undergarments: see the full ranking