TRIM FIT NON-IRON PANT, 40 x 30 / Charcoal vs Men's Ultimate Shirt: which is safer?

Dockers Men's Ultimate Shirt is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

CALVIN KLEIN TRIM FIT NON-IRON PANT, 40 x 30 / Charcoal

Calvin Klein

TRIM FIT NON-IRON PANT, 40 x 30 / Charcoal

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 8/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Cotton blend with non-iron/stain-resistant finish

Confidence

45%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in non-iron finish

PossibleFinish coating degradation and microfiber shedding

PossibleResidual chemicals from non-iron finish manufacturing

Our pick

Dockers Men's Ultimate Shirt

Dockers

Men's Ultimate Shirt

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Cotton and polyester blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in finish

PossibleAzo dyes and synthetic colorants

PossibleMicroplastics shedding

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Formaldehyde resins in non-iron finish, Finish coating degradation and microfiber shedding and Residual chemicals from non-iron finish manufacturing on the Calvin Klein and not on the Dockers.
  • We flag Formaldehyde resins in finish, Azo dyes and synthetic colorants, Microplastics shedding and Allergenic dyes or finishes on the Dockers and not on the Calvin Klein.
  • The Calvin Klein is Cotton blend with non-iron/stain-resistant finish where the Dockers is Cotton and polyester blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Dockers is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Calvin Klein grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More stain-resistant professional workwear: see the full ranking