Eddy + filtered by LifeStrawr, 32oz Bottle, Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel vs Sustainable Pitcher: which is safer?

CamelBak Eddy + filtered by LifeStrawr, 32oz Bottle, Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

CamelBak Eddy + filtered by LifeStrawr, 32oz Bottle, Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel

CamelBak

Eddy + filtered by LifeStrawr, 32oz Bottle, Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Vacuum insulated stainless steel body, activated carbon filter

Confidence

72%

PossibleBacterial growth in filter media if unmaintained

PossibleFilter seal degradation and filter bypass

Soma Sustainable Pitcher

Soma

Sustainable Pitcher

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge

Confidence

72%

PossibleBacterial growth in filter housing

PossibleActivated carbon dust in water

PossibleRubber seal degradation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Bacterial growth in filter media if unmaintained and Filter seal degradation and filter bypass on the CamelBak and not on the Soma.
  • We flag Bacterial growth in filter housing, Activated carbon dust in water and Rubber seal degradation on the Soma and not on the CamelBak.
  • The CamelBak is Vacuum insulated stainless steel body, activated carbon filter where the Soma is borosilicate glass pitcher, activated carbon filter cartridge, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More water filters: see the full ranking