Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt vs Men's Tech Training Short Sleeve T-Shirt: which is safer?
Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Carhartt
Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
100% cotton jersey knit, untreated
Confidence
78%
PossibleAzo dyes
PossibleMicrofiber shedding
Reebok
Men's Tech Training Short Sleeve T-Shirt
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Poor 43/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
polyester/cotton blend, standard knit
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes and residual dye chemicals
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in finish treatments
ReportedMicroplastic shedding during washing
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and Microfiber shedding on the Carhartt and not on the Reebok.
- We flag Azo dyes and residual dye chemicals, Formaldehyde resins in finish treatments, Microplastic shedding during washing and Heavy metals in pigments (if dark dyes used) on the Reebok and not on the Carhartt.
- The Carhartt is 100% cotton jersey knit, untreated where the Reebok is polyester/cotton blend, standard knit, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof sports undergarments: see the full ranking