Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt vs Women's Sleeveless Training Tank Top: which is safer?

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

100% cotton jersey knit, untreated

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes

PossibleMicrofiber shedding

Reebok Women's Sleeveless Training Tank Top

Reebok

Women's Sleeveless Training Tank Top

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

polyester blend fabric, no special coating

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal dye residues

PossibleFormaldehyde in textile finish resins

PossibleSpandex (elastane) degradation and microfiber release

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and Microfiber shedding on the Carhartt and not on the Reebok.
  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal dye residues, Formaldehyde in textile finish resins, Spandex (elastane) degradation and microfiber release and Fragrance or finishing chemical allergens on the Reebok and not on the Carhartt.
  • The Carhartt is 100% cotton jersey knit, untreated where the Reebok is polyester blend fabric, no special coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof sports undergarments: see the full ranking