Floating Waterproof Phone Pouch vs A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case: which is safer?

Case-Mate Floating Waterproof Phone Pouch is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Case-Mate Floating Waterproof Phone Pouch

Case-Mate

Floating Waterproof Phone Pouch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Plastic

Confidence

35%

PossiblePhthalates in flexible PVC

PossibleMold or bacterial growth inside if not dried

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from plastic off-gassing

Spigen A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case

Spigen

A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing

Confidence

42%

PossibleTPE material degradation

PossibleMicroplastic shedding

PossiblePFAS in waterproofing coatings

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Phthalates in flexible PVC, Mold or bacterial growth inside if not dried and Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from plastic off-gassing on the Case-Mate and not on the Spigen.
  • We flag TPE material degradation, Microplastic shedding and PFAS in waterproofing coatings on the Spigen and not on the Case-Mate.
  • The Case-Mate is Plastic where the Spigen is TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof personal electronics cases: see the full ranking