Case Mate Waterproof Floating Pouch vs A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case: which is safer?

Case Mate Waterproof Floating Pouch is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Case Mate Waterproof Floating Pouch

Case-Mate

Case Mate Waterproof Floating Pouch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Plastic

Confidence

45%

PossiblePlastic composition and leaching (unspecified polymer)

PossiblePhthalates (if PVC-based)

PossibleDegradation of seals and material over time

Spigen A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case

Spigen

A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing

Confidence

42%

PossibleTPE material degradation

PossibleMicroplastic shedding

PossiblePFAS in waterproofing coatings

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Plastic composition and leaching (unspecified polymer), Phthalates (if PVC-based) and Degradation of seals and material over time on the Case-Mate and not on the Spigen.
  • We flag TPE material degradation, Microplastic shedding and PFAS in waterproofing coatings on the Spigen and not on the Case-Mate.
  • The Case-Mate is Plastic where the Spigen is TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof personal electronics cases: see the full ranking