x LoveShackFancy Waterproof Floating Phone Pouch vs A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case: which is safer?

Case-Mate x LoveShackFancy Waterproof Floating Phone Pouch is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Case-Mate x LoveShackFancy Waterproof Floating Phone Pouch

Case-Mate

x LoveShackFancy Waterproof Floating Phone Pouch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 69/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Polyurethane or synthetic fabric

Confidence

35%

PossiblePolyurethane degradation and plasticizer migration

PossibleMicroplastics from fabric shedding or foam breakdown

PossibleAdhesive or solvent residues from manufacturing

Spigen A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case

Spigen

A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing

Confidence

42%

PossibleTPE material degradation

PossibleMicroplastic shedding

PossiblePFAS in waterproofing coatings

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Polyurethane degradation and plasticizer migration, Microplastics from fabric shedding or foam breakdown, Adhesive or solvent residues from manufacturing and Zipper or fastener corrosion or failure on the Case-Mate and not on the Spigen.
  • We flag TPE material degradation, Microplastic shedding and PFAS in waterproofing coatings on the Spigen and not on the Case-Mate.
  • The Case-Mate is Polyurethane or synthetic fabric where the Spigen is TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof personal electronics cases: see the full ranking