Moisturizing Cream vs PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
CeraVe
Moisturizing Cream
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Water, glycerin, ceramides, humectants (cream emulsion)
Confidence
78%
Possible1,4-dioxane (synthetic contaminant in emulsifiers)
PossiblePreservative safety and formaldehyde releasers
CeraVe
PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
water-based emulsion lotion with ceramides, hyaluronic acid, glycerin
Confidence
78%
PossiblePreservative sensitization (phenoxyethanol)
PossibleBacterial growth in pump dispenser
Where these two actually differ
- We flag 1,4-dioxane (synthetic contaminant in emulsifiers) and Preservative safety and formaldehyde releasers on the CeraVe and not on the CeraVe.
- We flag Preservative sensitization (phenoxyethanol) and Bacterial growth in pump dispenser on the CeraVe and not on the CeraVe.
- The CeraVe is Water, glycerin, ceramides, humectants (cream emulsion) where the CeraVe is water-based emulsion lotion with ceramides, hyaluronic acid, glycerin, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More moisturizer: see the full ranking