Moisturizing Cream vs Protini Polypeptide Cream: which is safer?
CeraVe Moisturizing Cream is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
CeraVe
Moisturizing Cream
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possible1,4-dioxane (synthetic contaminant in emulsifiers)
PossiblePreservative safety and formaldehyde releasers
Drunk Elephant
Protini Polypeptide Cream
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers
PossibleFormaldehyde releasers in preservative system
PossibleEye and mucous membrane irritation from peptide or ceramide particles
Where these two actually differ
- We flag 1,4-dioxane (synthetic contaminant in emulsifiers) and Preservative safety and formaldehyde releasers on the CeraVe and not on the Drunk Elephant.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and sensitizers, Formaldehyde releasers in preservative system and Eye and mucous membrane irritation from peptide or ceramide particles on the Drunk Elephant and not on the CeraVe.
- The CeraVe is Water, glycerin, ceramides, humectants (cream emulsion) where the Drunk Elephant is Water-based moisturizing cream; primary actives include peptide complex, ceramides, glycerin, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More moisturizer: see the full ranking