Roz Salt Scalp Scrub vs Grow Strong Thickening Shampoo: which is safer?

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

Confidence

82%

PossibleFragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

ReportedMechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Garnier Fructis Grow Strong Thickening Shampoo

Garnier Fructis

Grow Strong Thickening Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous shampoo solution

Confidence

78%

PossibleFragrance allergens and skin sensitizers

Possible1,4-Dioxane (contamination in surfactant supply chain)

LikelyEye irritation (product misdirection)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components and Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape on the Credo Beauty and not on the Garnier Fructis.
  • We flag Fragrance allergens and skin sensitizers, 1,4-Dioxane (contamination in surfactant supply chain) and Eye irritation (product misdirection) on the Garnier Fructis and not on the Credo Beauty.
  • The Credo Beauty is salt crystals, mineral-based scrub where the Garnier Fructis is aqueous shampoo solution, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Credo Beauty is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More shampoo: see the full ranking