Beaver DamFast Wax vs PS10 Yellow Wax: which is safer?
Swix PS10 Yellow Wax is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Beaver Wax
Beaver DamFast Wax
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) / off-gassing
PossibleHeavy metal contamination in natural wax components
PossibleSkin and respiratory irritation from additives
Our pick
Swix
PS10 Yellow Wax
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCombustion by-products during hot application
PossibleSkin and eye contact irritation
PossibleIngestion toxicity (accidental exposure)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) / off-gassing, Heavy metal contamination in natural wax components, Skin and respiratory irritation from additives and Thermal stability and degradation products on the Beaver Wax and not on the Swix.
- We flag Combustion by-products during hot application, Skin and eye contact irritation, Ingestion toxicity (accidental exposure) and Microabrasive particulates from worn base or scraping on the Swix and not on the Beaver Wax.
- The Beaver Wax is Unknown wax composition where the Swix is Hydrocarbon-based ski wax (paraffin/synthetic blend), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Swix is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Beaver Wax grade, at 25% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ski & sports wax: see the full ranking