Beaver DamFast Wax vs PS10 Yellow Wax: which is safer?

Swix PS10 Yellow Wax is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Beaver DamFast Wax

Beaver Wax

Beaver DamFast Wax

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Unknown wax composition

Confidence

25%

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) / off-gassing

PossibleHeavy metal contamination in natural wax components

PossibleSkin and respiratory irritation from additives

Our pick

Swix PS10 Yellow Wax

Swix

PS10 Yellow Wax

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 84/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Hydrocarbon-based ski wax (paraffin/synthetic blend)

Confidence

72%

PossibleCombustion by-products during hot application

PossibleSkin and eye contact irritation

PossibleIngestion toxicity (accidental exposure)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) / off-gassing, Heavy metal contamination in natural wax components, Skin and respiratory irritation from additives and Thermal stability and degradation products on the Beaver Wax and not on the Swix.
  • We flag Combustion by-products during hot application, Skin and eye contact irritation, Ingestion toxicity (accidental exposure) and Microabrasive particulates from worn base or scraping on the Swix and not on the Beaver Wax.
  • The Beaver Wax is Unknown wax composition where the Swix is Hydrocarbon-based ski wax (paraffin/synthetic blend), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Swix is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Beaver Wax grade, at 25% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ski & sports wax: see the full ranking