Mags 10 Cushion vs Acadia Outdoor 61in Sofa Cushion: which is safer?
Design Within Reach Mags 10 Cushion is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Design Within Reach
Mags 10 Cushion
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from fabric finishing
PossibleFormaldehyde in fabric resins or dyes
PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal residues in fabric
Acadia Outdoor 61in Sofa Cushion
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleStain-resist fluorinated finishes (PFAS-class)
PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating or dyes
LikelyCoating degradation and microplastic shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from fabric finishing, Formaldehyde in fabric resins or dyes, Azo dyes and heavy metal residues in fabric and Microbial growth in fill if exposed to moisture on the Design Within Reach and not on the .
- We flag Stain-resist fluorinated finishes (PFAS-class), Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating or dyes, Coating degradation and microplastic shedding and Mildew and bacterial growth if moisture trapped on the and not on the Design Within Reach.
- The Design Within Reach is down and feather fill, fabric cover where the is Polyester cushion cover; likely acrylic or polyester-blend upholstery, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More outdoor furniture cushion protectants: see the full ranking