EAF12B Air Fryer vs Crispi 4-in-1 Portable Glass Air Fryer Cooking System: which is safer?
Ninja Crispi 4-in-1 Portable Glass Air Fryer Cooking System is the clear pick. Electrolux EAF12B Air Fryer carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Electrolux
EAF12B Air Fryer
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTeflon-type coating thermal fume release
PossibleCoating degradation and microparticle release
ReportedLack of material transparency and third-party assurance
Our pick
Ninja
Crispi 4-in-1 Portable Glass Air Fryer Cooking System
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleThermal fracture or stress in glass cooking vessel
PossiblePlastic housing off-gassing (VOCs and formaldehyde)
PossibleElectrical hazard or heating element degradation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PTFE thermal fume release, Coating degradation and microparticle release and Lack of material transparency and third-party assurance on the Electrolux and not on the Ninja.
- We flag Thermal fracture or stress in glass cooking vessel, Plastic housing off-gassing (VOCs and formaldehyde) and Electrical hazard or heating element degradation on the Ninja and not on the Electrolux.
- The Electrolux is Nonstick-coated cooking basket, composition unspecified where the Ninja is Glass cooking vessel with stainless steel and plastic components, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 60 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Ninja is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Electrolux grade, at 35% confidence against 75%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More air fryers: see the full ranking