ProSeries Silicone Baking Mat vs Sweet Jojo Designs Silicone Bowl Liners with Lids for KitchenAid Mixer: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Fat Daddio's ProSeries Silicone Baking Mat

Fat Daddio's

ProSeries Silicone Baking Mat

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

silicone (elastomer)

Confidence

78%

PossibleSilicone elastomer degradation under prolonged high heat

PossibleMold or bacterial growth if stored wet

Sweet Jojo Designs Silicone Bowl Liners with Lids for KitchenAid Mixer

Kitchenaid

Sweet Jojo Designs Silicone Bowl Liners with Lids for KitchenAid Mixer

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Silicone (composition of additives unspecified)

Confidence

35%

PossibleSilicone additive migration (non-PFAS)

PossibleHeat-induced polymer breakdown and off-gassing

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Silicone elastomer degradation under prolonged high heat and Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet on the Fat Daddio's and not on the Kitchenaid.
  • We flag Silicone additive migration (non-PFAS) and Heat-induced polymer breakdown and off-gassing on the Kitchenaid and not on the Fat Daddio's.
  • The Fat Daddio's is silicone (elastomer) where the Kitchenaid is Silicone (composition of additives unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Kitchenaid grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More silicone baking molds: see the full ranking