ProSeries Silicone Baking Mat vs Sweet Jojo Designs Silicone Bowl Liners with Lids for KitchenAid Mixer: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Fat Daddio's
ProSeries Silicone Baking Mat
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
silicone (elastomer)
Confidence
78%
PossibleSilicone elastomer degradation under prolonged high heat
PossibleMold or bacterial growth if stored wet
Kitchenaid
Sweet Jojo Designs Silicone Bowl Liners with Lids for KitchenAid Mixer
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Silicone (composition of additives unspecified)
Confidence
35%
PossibleSilicone additive migration (non-PFAS)
PossibleHeat-induced polymer breakdown and off-gassing
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Silicone elastomer degradation under prolonged high heat and Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet on the Fat Daddio's and not on the Kitchenaid.
- We flag Silicone additive migration (non-PFAS) and Heat-induced polymer breakdown and off-gassing on the Kitchenaid and not on the Fat Daddio's.
- The Fat Daddio's is silicone (elastomer) where the Kitchenaid is Silicone (composition of additives unspecified), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Kitchenaid grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More silicone baking molds: see the full ranking