Pixel/ Pixel XL 2 3 Type C USB-C to USB-C USB Data Cable vs A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case: which is safer?
Google Pixel/ Pixel XL 2 3 Type C USB-C to USB-C USB Data Cable is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Pixel/ Pixel XL 2 3 Type C USB-C to USB-C USB Data Cable
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 71/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
PVC or TPE cable jacket, copper wire
Confidence
72%
PossiblePlasticizer leaching from PVC jacket
ReportedInsulation degradation and wire exposure
Spigen
A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing
Confidence
42%
PossibleTPE material degradation
PossibleMicroplastic shedding
PossiblePFAS in waterproofing coatings
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Plasticizer leaching from PVC jacket and Insulation degradation and wire exposure on the Google and not on the Spigen.
- We flag TPE material degradation, Microplastic shedding and PFAS in waterproofing coatings on the Spigen and not on the Google.
- The Google is PVC or TPE cable jacket, copper wire where the Spigen is TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Spigen grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof personal electronics cases: see the full ranking