Ceramic Non-stick vs Ceramic Bistro Saute Pan Black: which is safer?

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick is the clear pick. IMUSA Ceramic Bistro Saute Pan Black carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 78/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

not stated

Confidence

100%

PossibleCoating degradation and integrity loss

PossibleAluminum leaching

PossibleMicroparticle shedding from coating

IMUSA Ceramic Bistro Saute Pan Black

Imusa

Ceramic Bistro Saute Pan Black

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 29/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

ceramic nonstick coating

Confidence

72%

PossibleLead/cadmium in glaze or primer layer

LikelyCeramic coating degradation and peeling

PossibleAluminum leaching from base metal

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Coating degradation and integrity loss, Aluminum leaching and Microparticle shedding from coating on the GreenPan and not on the Imusa.
  • We flag Lead/cadmium in glaze or primer layer, Ceramic coating degradation and peeling, Aluminum leaching from base metal and Manufacturing QC and uneven coating thickness on the Imusa and not on the GreenPan.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Imusa grade, at 72% confidence against 100%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cookware: see the full ranking