Ceramic Non-stick vs Imusa Mirro Ceramic Coated Aluminum Fry Pan: which is safer?

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick is the clear pick. Imusa Mirro Ceramic Coated Aluminum Fry Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 78/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

not stated

Confidence

100%

PossibleCoating degradation and integrity loss

PossibleAluminum leaching

PossibleMicroparticle shedding from coating

Imusa Mirro Ceramic Coated Aluminum Fry Pan

Mirro

Imusa Mirro Ceramic Coated Aluminum Fry Pan

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aluminum with ceramic nonstick coating

Confidence

72%

PossibleAluminum leaching

ReportedCeramic coating degradation and microchipping

PossibleTeflon-type coating or undisclosed nonstick binders

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Coating degradation and integrity loss and Microparticle shedding from coating on the GreenPan and not on the Mirro.
  • We flag Ceramic coating degradation and microchipping and PTFE or undisclosed nonstick binders on the Mirro and not on the GreenPan.
  • Both carry a flag for Aluminum leaching, so neither choice avoids it.
  • The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Mirro grade, at 72% confidence against 100%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cookware: see the full ranking