Ceramic Non-stick vs Aluminum Non-Stick Frying Pan | Electric: which is safer?

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick is the clear pick. Mirro Aluminum Non-Stick Frying Pan | Electric carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 78/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

not stated

Confidence

100%

PossibleCoating degradation and integrity loss

PossibleAluminum leaching

PossibleMicroparticle shedding from coating

Mirro Aluminum Non-Stick Frying Pan | Electric

Mirro

Aluminum Non-Stick Frying Pan | Electric

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Aluminum with non-stick coating, type unspecified

Confidence

35%

PossibleAluminum leaching (reactive with acidic/alkaline foods)

PossibleTeflon-type coating fume release (if coating is Teflon-based)

ReportedNon-stick coating degradation and peeling

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Coating degradation and integrity loss, Aluminum leaching and Microparticle shedding from coating on the GreenPan and not on the Mirro.
  • We flag Aluminum leaching (reactive with acidic/alkaline foods), PTFE fume release (if coating is Teflon-based), Non-stick coating degradation and peeling and PFAS in non-stick coating (Teflon or legacy formulas) on the Mirro and not on the GreenPan.
  • The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Mirro grade, at 35% confidence against 100%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cookware: see the full ranking