Ceramic Non-stick vs Ashford Aluminum Frying Pan: which is safer?

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick is the clear pick. Oster Ashford Aluminum Frying Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 78/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

not stated

Confidence

100%

PossibleCoating degradation and integrity loss

PossibleAluminum leaching

PossibleMicroparticle shedding from coating

Oster Ashford Aluminum Frying Pan

Oster

Ashford Aluminum Frying Pan

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aluminum with unspecified nonstick coating

Confidence

35%

PossibleTeflon-type coating fume risk and coating degradation

ReportedCoating particle shedding

PossibleUnknown PFAS or PFAS substitutes in coating

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Coating degradation and integrity loss, Aluminum leaching and Microparticle shedding from coating on the GreenPan and not on the Oster.
  • We flag PTFE fume risk and coating degradation, Coating particle shedding and Unknown PFAS or PFAS substitutes in coating on the Oster and not on the GreenPan.
  • The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Oster grade, at 35% confidence against 100%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cookware: see the full ranking