Power Cord for Xtreme 2 Waterproof vs A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case: which is safer?

JBL Power Cord for Xtreme 2 Waterproof is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

JBL Power Cord for Xtreme 2 Waterproof

JBL

Power Cord for Xtreme 2 Waterproof

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Rubber/PVC power cord, standard electrical insulation

Confidence

72%

PossibleElectrical shock risk from insulation degradation

PossiblePhthalates in PVC insulation

PossibleThermal runaway if cord is pinched or compressed

Spigen A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case

Spigen

A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing

Confidence

42%

PossibleTPE material degradation

PossibleMicroplastic shedding

PossiblePFAS in waterproofing coatings

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Electrical shock risk from insulation degradation, Phthalates in PVC insulation, Thermal runaway if cord is pinched or compressed and Counterfeit or substandard replacement risk on the JBL and not on the Spigen.
  • We flag TPE material degradation, Microplastic shedding and PFAS in waterproofing coatings on the Spigen and not on the JBL.
  • The JBL is Rubber/PVC power cord, standard electrical insulation where the Spigen is TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Spigen grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof personal electronics cases: see the full ranking