Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag vs Extended Totebag: which is safer?

Kelty Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Kelty Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag

Kelty

Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 69/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Polyester webbing and nylon

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes in polyester webbing

PossibleAdhesive and seam-tape volatiles (VOC)

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Salomon Extended Totebag

Salomon

Extended Totebag

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

polyester/nylon tote fabric, standard construction

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and formaldehyde resins in fabric dyeing

PossibleAntimony trioxide in polyester

Reportedwater-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment, PFAS or legacy types

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes in polyester webbing, Adhesive and seam-tape volatiles (VOC), Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing and Microplastic shedding from webbing degradation on the Kelty and not on the Salomon.
  • We flag Azo dyes and formaldehyde resins in fabric dyeing, Antimony trioxide in polyester, Durable water-repellent (DWR) treatment, PFAS or legacy types and VOC off-gassing from dyes and finishes on the Salomon and not on the Kelty.
  • The Kelty is Polyester webbing and nylon where the Salomon is polyester/nylon tote fabric, standard construction, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof bags & luggage: see the full ranking