The Lola High Waist Period Underwear vs Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

organic cotton with water-resistant treatment

Confidence

82%

PossibleWater-resistant coating degradation and microplastic shedding

PossibleAllergen sensitivity to cotton or treatment additives

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating

Confidence

85%

PossibleWater-resistant coating degradation

PossibleMicrobial growth and odor with improper care

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Water-resistant coating degradation and microplastic shedding and Allergen sensitivity to cotton or treatment additives on the Lola and not on the Modibodi.
  • We flag Water-resistant coating degradation and Microbial growth and odor with improper care on the Modibodi and not on the Lola.
  • The Lola is organic cotton with water-resistant treatment where the Modibodi is organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More period underwear: see the full ranking