Headphone Case for Marshall Motif II True Wireless Active Noise-Canceling Earbuds Headphones, Hard vs Geekria Shield Earbuds Case for Skullcandy EcoBuds, Dime 2 / 3 Smokin': which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Marshall
Headphone Case for Marshall Motif II True Wireless Active Noise-Canceling Earbuds Headphones, Hard
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Hard case, likely polycarbonate or EVA
Confidence
35%
PossibleBPA leaching (polycarbonate)
PossibleMold or bacterial growth in sealed storage
Skullcandy
Geekria Shield Earbuds Case for Skullcandy EcoBuds, Dime 2 / 3 Smokin'
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
EVA foam case shell
Confidence
72%
PossibleMicroplastics or foam degradation fragments
PossibleBacterial or mold growth in case cavity
Where these two actually differ
- We flag BPA leaching (polycarbonate) and Mold or bacterial growth in sealed storage on the Marshall and not on the Skullcandy.
- We flag Microplastics or foam degradation fragments and Bacterial or mold growth in case cavity on the Skullcandy and not on the Marshall.
- The Marshall is Hard case, likely polycarbonate or EVA where the Skullcandy is EVA foam case shell, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Marshall grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof earbuds & cases: see the full ranking