Men's Speed Strike 2 Mid Waterproof vs Men's Killington Trekker Sneaker Boots: which is safer?

Merrell Men's Speed Strike 2 Mid Waterproof is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Merrell Men's Speed Strike 2 Mid Waterproof

Merrell

Men's Speed Strike 2 Mid Waterproof

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

textile upper with waterproof coating

Confidence

35%

PossiblePFAS in waterproof coating

PossibleOff-gassing of volatile organic compounds from synthetic coating

Timberland Men's Killington Trekker Sneaker Boots

Timberland

Men's Killington Trekker Sneaker Boots

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Leather, nubuck, rubber sole with waterproof treatment

Confidence

45%

LikelyTeflon-type coating and fluorocarbon microparticle shedding

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in leather tanning and finishing

PossibleAzo dye residues in nubuck finish

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS in waterproof coating and Off-gassing of volatile organic compounds from synthetic coating on the Merrell and not on the Timberland.
  • We flag PTFE and fluorocarbon microparticle shedding, Formaldehyde resins in leather tanning and finishing, Azo dye residues in nubuck finish and Adhesive and glue volatiles at seams on the Timberland and not on the Merrell.
  • The Merrell is textile upper with waterproof coating where the Timberland is Leather, nubuck, rubber sole with waterproof treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More hiking shoes & trail runners: see the full ranking