Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief vs Cotton Starter Set Period Underwear: which is safer?

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief is the clear pick. Thinx Cotton Starter Set Period Underwear carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating

Confidence

85%

PossibleWater-resistant coating degradation

PossibleMicrobial growth and odor with improper care

Thinx Cotton Starter Set Period Underwear

Thinx

Cotton Starter Set Period Underwear

PFAS grade

Poor 25/100

Overall grade

Bad 7/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Cotton + proprietary waterproof/absorbent layer coating

Confidence

45%

ReportedPFAS in waterproof coating (separate grading)

PossibleCoating degradation and particle shedding

PossibleBacterial growth if moisture is trapped

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Water-resistant coating degradation and Microbial growth and odor with improper care on the Modibodi and not on the Thinx.
  • We flag PFAS in waterproof coating (separate grading), Coating degradation and particle shedding and Bacterial growth if moisture is trapped on the Thinx and not on the Modibodi.
  • The Modibodi is organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating where the Thinx is Cotton + proprietary waterproof/absorbent layer coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Modibodi is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Thinx grade, at 45% confidence against 85%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More period underwear: see the full ranking