Cable 100W USB-C to USB-C 2.0 Charge & Sync Cable vs A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case: which is safer?
Mophie Cable 100W USB-C to USB-C 2.0 Charge & Sync Cable is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Mophie
Cable 100W USB-C to USB-C 2.0 Charge & Sync Cable
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleJacket material leaching (PVC/TPE)
PossibleConnector contact degradation
PossibleMicroplastics and end-of-life breakdown
Spigen
A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTPE material degradation
PossibleMicroplastic shedding
PossiblePFAS in waterproofing coatings
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Jacket material leaching (PVC/TPE), Connector contact degradation and Microplastics and end-of-life breakdown on the Mophie and not on the Spigen.
- We flag TPE material degradation, Microplastic shedding and PFAS in waterproofing coatings on the Spigen and not on the Mophie.
- The Mophie is PVC or TPE jacket, copper/aluminum conductors where the Spigen is TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Spigen grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof personal electronics cases: see the full ranking