Pro-V Daily Moisture Renewal Conditioner vs All Soft Conditioner: which is safer?
Pantene Pro-V Daily Moisture Renewal Conditioner is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Pantene
Pro-V Daily Moisture Renewal Conditioner
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
aqueous conditioning cream; typical surfactants, silicones, emollients
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleSilicone buildup (cosmetic, not toxicological)
Redken
All Soft Conditioner
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
Water-based conditioner with standard emollients and conditioning agents
Confidence
72%
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
PossibleFormaldehyde releasers
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and Silicone buildup (cosmetic, not toxicological) on the Pantene and not on the Redken.
- We flag 1,4-dioxane contamination, Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components, Formaldehyde releasers and Scalp and eye irritation from conditioning agents on the Redken and not on the Pantene.
- The Pantene is aqueous conditioning cream; typical surfactants, silicones, emollients where the Redken is Water-based conditioner with standard emollients and conditioning agents, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More conditioner: see the full ranking