A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case vs Slim Armor MagFit Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max: which is safer?
Spigen Slim Armor MagFit Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Spigen
A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing
Confidence
42%
PossibleTPE material degradation
PossibleMicroplastic shedding
PossiblePFAS in waterproofing coatings
Our pick
Spigen
Slim Armor MagFit Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 81/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane), polycarbonate, aluminum
Confidence
72%
PossibleTPU degradation and microplastic shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag TPE material degradation, Microplastic shedding and PFAS in waterproofing coatings on the Spigen and not on the Spigen.
- We flag TPU degradation and microplastic shedding on the Spigen and not on the Spigen.
- The Spigen is TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing where the Spigen is TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane), polycarbonate, aluminum, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Spigen grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof personal electronics cases: see the full ranking