A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case vs Thintect MagFit Case for Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: which is safer?
Spigen Thintect MagFit Case for Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Spigen
A610 Universal Waterproof Float Case
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTPE material degradation
PossibleMicroplastic shedding
PossiblePFAS in waterproofing coatings
Our pick
Spigen
Thintect MagFit Case for Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleBisphenol A (BPA) from polycarbonate shell
PossibleVolatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from polymer degradation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag TPE material degradation, Microplastic shedding and PFAS in waterproofing coatings on the Spigen and not on the Spigen.
- We flag Bisphenol A (BPA) from polycarbonate shell, Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing and Microplastic shedding from polymer degradation on the Spigen and not on the Spigen.
- The Spigen is TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) with waterproof sealing where the Spigen is Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), hard polycarbonate shell, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Spigen grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof personal electronics cases: see the full ranking