Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3 vs Think Tank Hydrophobia DM 300-600 Rain Cover: which is safer?

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3 is the clear pick. Think Tank Hydrophobia DM 300-600 Rain Cover carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

Confidence

45%

PossibleUndisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

PossibleCoating degradation over time

Think Tank Hydrophobia DM 300-600 Rain Cover

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Hydrophobia DM 300-600 Rain Cover

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Poor 32/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Polyester/nylon with water-repellent water-repellent coating

Confidence

42%

Possiblewater-repellent coating leachables (PFAS status unknown)

PossibleCoating degradation over time

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry on the Think Tank Photo and not on the Think Tank Photo.
  • We flag DWR coating leachables (PFAS status unknown) on the Think Tank Photo and not on the Think Tank Photo.
  • Both carry a flag for Coating degradation over time, so neither choice avoids it.
  • The Think Tank Photo is Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware where the Think Tank Photo is Polyester/nylon with water-repellent DWR coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Think Tank Photo is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases: see the full ranking