Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3 vs Airport TakeOff V2.0 Rolling Camera Bag: which is safer?
Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3 is the clear pick. Think Tank Photo Airport TakeOff V2.0 Rolling Camera Bag carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Think Tank Photo
Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleUndisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry
PossibleCoating degradation over time
Think Tank Photo
Airport TakeOff V2.0 Rolling Camera Bag
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and potential microparticle release
PossibleMold and bacterial growth if stored damp
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry and Coating degradation over time on the Think Tank Photo and not on the Think Tank Photo.
- We flag DWR coating degradation and potential microparticle release and Mold and bacterial growth if stored damp on the Think Tank Photo and not on the Think Tank Photo.
- The Think Tank Photo is Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware where the Think Tank Photo is Ballistic nylon with DWR water-resistant treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Think Tank Photo is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases: see the full ranking