Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3 vs Filter Tiffen Black Pro-Mist: which is safer?
Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3 is the clear pick. Filter Tiffen Black Pro-Mist carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Think Tank Photo
Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware
Confidence
45%
PossibleUndisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry
PossibleCoating degradation over time
Tiffen
Filter Tiffen Black Pro-Mist
PFAS grade
Good 50/100
Overall grade
Poor 46/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Optical glass with anti-reflective and diffusion coatings
Confidence
35%
PossibleGlass surface degradation and micro-particle release
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry and Coating degradation over time on the Think Tank Photo and not on the Tiffen.
- We flag Glass surface degradation and micro-particle release on the Tiffen and not on the Think Tank Photo.
- The Think Tank Photo is Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware where the Tiffen is Optical glass with anti-reflective and diffusion coatings, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Think Tank Photo is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases: see the full ranking