Water Resistant Watch Model 8R500 - Men vs Raptic Citizen Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure Apple Watch Band: which is safer?
TomTom Water Resistant Watch Model 8R500 - Men is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
TomTom
Water Resistant Watch Model 8R500 - Men
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePolymer case and band degradation
PossibleBacterial or mold growth in seals and band
X-Doria
Raptic Citizen Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure Apple Watch Band
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel
PossibleContact dermatitis from closure mechanism materials
PossibleBacterial/biofilm accumulation at band-watch junction
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Polymer case and band degradation and Bacterial or mold growth in seals and band on the TomTom and not on the X-Doria.
- We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel, Contact dermatitis from closure mechanism materials and Bacterial/biofilm accumulation at band-watch junction on the X-Doria and not on the TomTom.
- The TomTom is On watch case and band where the X-Doria is Stainless steel band, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the TomTom grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof fitness trackers & cases: see the full ranking