Water Resistant Watch Model 8R500 - Men vs Smart Watch Fitness Tracker, 1.47'' TFT Display, 21-Day Battery Life, 50 Fitness Modes, 50m Water Resistant, Smar: which is safer?

Xiaomi Smart Watch Fitness Tracker, 1.47'' TFT Display, 21-Day Battery Life, 50 Fitness Modes, 50m Water Resistant, Smar is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

TomTom Water Resistant Watch Model 8R500 - Men

TomTom

Water Resistant Watch Model 8R500 - Men

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

On watch case and band

Confidence

35%

PossiblePolymer case and band degradation

PossibleBacterial or mold growth in seals and band

Our pick

Xiaomi Smart Watch Fitness Tracker, 1.47'' TFT Display, 21-Day Battery Life, 50 Fitness Modes, 50m Water Resistant, Smar

Xiaomi

Smart Watch Fitness Tracker, 1.47'' TFT Display, 21-Day Battery Life, 50 Fitness Modes, 50m Water Resistant, Smar

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 81/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Unspecified polymers, likely silicone and stainless steel band; 50m

Confidence

35%

PossibleWater resistance seal failure and bacterial/mold growth

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Polymer case and band degradation and Bacterial or mold growth in seals and band on the TomTom and not on the Xiaomi.
  • We flag Water resistance seal failure and bacterial/mold growth on the Xiaomi and not on the TomTom.
  • The TomTom is On watch case and band where the Xiaomi is Unspecified polymers, likely silicone and stainless steel band; 50m, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof fitness trackers & cases: see the full ranking