Acadia Outdoor 61in Sofa Cushion vs Santa Barbara Dining Side Cushion: which is safer?
Williams Sonoma Santa Barbara Dining Side Cushion is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Acadia Outdoor 61in Sofa Cushion
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleStain-resist fluorinated finishes (PFAS-class)
PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating or dyes
LikelyCoating degradation and microplastic shedding
Our pick
Williams Sonoma
Santa Barbara Dining Side Cushion
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVOC off-gassing from polyurethane foam fill
PossibleDegradation and microparticle release under UV
PossibleMold and bacterial growth in moist conditions
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Stain-resist fluorinated finishes (PFAS-class), Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating or dyes, Coating degradation and microplastic shedding and Mildew and bacterial growth if moisture trapped on the and not on the Williams Sonoma.
- We flag VOC off-gassing from polyurethane foam fill, Degradation and microparticle release under UV and Mold and bacterial growth in moist conditions on the Williams Sonoma and not on the .
- The is Polyester cushion cover; likely acrylic or polyester-blend upholstery where the Williams Sonoma is Polyester cushion cover, likely filled with polyurethane or polyester fibers, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More outdoor furniture cushion protectants: see the full ranking